summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>2016-07-18 14:46:35 -0700
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2016-07-19 08:50:24 +0200
commit57f90c3dfc75da89358735c06bf9bc9815b4183e (patch)
treebdcfcbc1e2d76bc8e791f60608e5f9aed6185fc8 /arch
parentbe8a18e2e98e04a5def5887d913b267865562448 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-57f90c3dfc75da89358735c06bf9bc9815b4183e.tar.gz
linux-stable-57f90c3dfc75da89358735c06bf9bc9815b4183e.tar.bz2
linux-stable-57f90c3dfc75da89358735c06bf9bc9815b4183e.zip
x86/vdso: Error out if the vDSO isn't a valid DSO
Some distros has been playing with toolchain changes that can affect the type of ELF objects built. Occasionally, this goes wrong and the vDSO ends up not being a DSO at all. This causes the kernel to end up broken in a surprisingly subtle way -- glibc apparently silently ignores a vDSO that isn't a DSO, so everything works, albeit slowly, until users try a different libc implementation. Make the kernel build process a bit more robust: fail outright if the vDSO isn't ET_DYN or is missing its PT_DYNAMIC segment. I've never seen this in an unmodified kernel. See: https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/23378 Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8a30e0a07c3b47ff917a8daa2df5e407cc0c6698.1468878336.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h
index 63a03bb91497..4f741192846d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ static void BITSFUNC(go)(void *raw_addr, size_t raw_len,
ELF(Phdr) *pt = (ELF(Phdr) *)(raw_addr + GET_LE(&hdr->e_phoff));
+ if (hdr->e_type != ET_DYN)
+ fail("input is not a shared object\n");
+
/* Walk the segment table. */
for (i = 0; i < GET_LE(&hdr->e_phnum); i++) {
if (GET_LE(&pt[i].p_type) == PT_LOAD) {
@@ -49,6 +52,9 @@ static void BITSFUNC(go)(void *raw_addr, size_t raw_len,
if (stripped_len < load_size)
fail("stripped input is too short\n");
+ if (!dyn)
+ fail("input has no PT_DYNAMIC section -- your toolchain is buggy\n");
+
/* Walk the dynamic table */
for (i = 0; dyn + i < dyn_end &&
GET_LE(&dyn[i].d_tag) != DT_NULL; i++) {