diff options
author | Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> | 2022-04-25 14:22:12 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> | 2022-05-30 14:24:04 +0200 |
commit | 245a4a7b531cffb41233a716497c25b06835cf4b (patch) | |
tree | d9da42cead12ac1cfc5583fd14751d99c4b39140 /drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c | |
parent | 8f61973718485f3e89bc4f408f929048b7b47c83 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-245a4a7b531cffb41233a716497c25b06835cf4b.tar.gz linux-stable-245a4a7b531cffb41233a716497c25b06835cf4b.tar.bz2 linux-stable-245a4a7b531cffb41233a716497c25b06835cf4b.zip |
dma-buf: generalize dma_fence unwrap & merging v3
Introduce a dma_fence_unwrap_merge() macro which allows to unwrap fences
which potentially can be containers as well and then merge them back
together into a flat dma_fence_array.
v2: rename the function, add some more comments about how the wrapper is
used, move filtering of signaled fences into the unwrap iterator,
add complex selftest which covers more cases.
v3: fix signaled fence filtering once more
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220518135844.3338-5-christian.koenig@amd.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c | 109 |
1 files changed, 109 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c index e20c5a7dcfe4..4105d5ea8dde 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c @@ -238,6 +238,113 @@ static int unwrap_chain_array(void *arg) return err; } +static int unwrap_merge(void *arg) +{ + struct dma_fence *fence, *f1, *f2, *f3; + struct dma_fence_unwrap iter; + int err = 0; + + f1 = mock_fence(); + if (!f1) + return -ENOMEM; + + f2 = mock_fence(); + if (!f2) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto error_put_f1; + } + + f3 = dma_fence_unwrap_merge(f1, f2); + if (!f3) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto error_put_f2; + } + + dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(fence, &iter, f3) { + if (fence == f1) { + dma_fence_put(f1); + f1 = NULL; + } else if (fence == f2) { + dma_fence_put(f2); + f2 = NULL; + } else { + pr_err("Unexpected fence!\n"); + err = -EINVAL; + } + } + + if (f1 || f2) { + pr_err("Not all fences seen!\n"); + err = -EINVAL; + } + + dma_fence_put(f3); +error_put_f2: + dma_fence_put(f2); +error_put_f1: + dma_fence_put(f1); + return err; +} + +static int unwrap_merge_complex(void *arg) +{ + struct dma_fence *fence, *f1, *f2, *f3, *f4, *f5; + struct dma_fence_unwrap iter; + int err = -ENOMEM; + + f1 = mock_fence(); + if (!f1) + return -ENOMEM; + + f2 = mock_fence(); + if (!f2) + goto error_put_f1; + + f3 = dma_fence_unwrap_merge(f1, f2); + if (!f3) + goto error_put_f2; + + /* The resulting array has the fences in reverse */ + f4 = dma_fence_unwrap_merge(f2, f1); + if (!f4) + goto error_put_f3; + + /* Signaled fences should be filtered, the two arrays merged. */ + f5 = dma_fence_unwrap_merge(f3, f4, dma_fence_get_stub()); + if (!f5) + goto error_put_f4; + + err = 0; + dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(fence, &iter, f5) { + if (fence == f1) { + dma_fence_put(f1); + f1 = NULL; + } else if (fence == f2) { + dma_fence_put(f2); + f2 = NULL; + } else { + pr_err("Unexpected fence!\n"); + err = -EINVAL; + } + } + + if (f1 || f2) { + pr_err("Not all fences seen!\n"); + err = -EINVAL; + } + + dma_fence_put(f5); +error_put_f4: + dma_fence_put(f4); +error_put_f3: + dma_fence_put(f3); +error_put_f2: + dma_fence_put(f2); +error_put_f1: + dma_fence_put(f1); + return err; +} + int dma_fence_unwrap(void) { static const struct subtest tests[] = { @@ -245,6 +352,8 @@ int dma_fence_unwrap(void) SUBTEST(unwrap_array), SUBTEST(unwrap_chain), SUBTEST(unwrap_chain_array), + SUBTEST(unwrap_merge), + SUBTEST(unwrap_merge_complex), }; return subtests(tests, NULL); |