summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2019-04-07 20:26:49 +0100
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2019-04-08 19:15:05 +0100
commit6484775766e37049883d49e7ee9c1a174f0d0524 (patch)
tree6ab9d04a0a188aefb9baa1570c7ccdbc1e9e12bf /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests
parent7ae6ad6fbd83c74c37e70b7699248256eaa152a8 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-6484775766e37049883d49e7ee9c1a174f0d0524.tar.gz
linux-stable-6484775766e37049883d49e7ee9c1a174f0d0524.tar.bz2
linux-stable-6484775766e37049883d49e7ee9c1a174f0d0524.zip
drm/i915/selftests: Mark live_forcewake_ops as unreliable
A couple of machines in the farm show quite frequent errors in the powerwells not being released. Either there is an external agent interferring with the powerwells, or the powerwell doesn't quite behave as we anticipate -- either way, the test is not reliable enough to be enabled by default in CI. It has served its immediate purpose in providing coverage as we made tweaks to forcewake, so keep it available for future testing. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110210 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190407192649.14750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c11
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
index ee0bc91f7664..e0d7ebecb215 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
@@ -155,6 +155,17 @@ static int live_forcewake_ops(void *arg)
return 0;
}
+ /*
+ * Not quite as reliable across the gen as one would hope.
+ *
+ * Either our theory of operation is incorrect, or there remain
+ * external parties interfering with the powerwells.
+ *
+ * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110210
+ */
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST_BROKEN))
+ return 0;
+
/* We have to pick carefully to get the exact behaviour we need */
for (r = registers; r->name; r++)
if (r->platforms & INTEL_INFO(i915)->gen_mask)