Merge tag 'v5.3-rc1' into patchwork

Linus 5.3-rc1

* tag 'v5.3-rc1': (12816 commits)
  Linus 5.3-rc1
  iommu/amd: fix a crash in iova_magazine_free_pfns
  hexagon: switch to generic version of pte allocation
  typo fix: it's d_make_root, not d_make_inode...
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: Fix missing 'clocks' property in examples
  dt-bindings: iio: ad7124: Fix dtc warnings in example
  dt-bindings: iio: avia-hx711: Fix avdd-supply typo in example
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: aspeed: Fix AST2500 example errors
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: aspeed: Fix 'compatible' schema errors
  dt-bindings: riscv: Limit cpus schema to only check RiscV 'cpu' nodes
  dt-bindings: Ensure child nodes are of type 'object'
  x86/entry/64: Prevent clobbering of saved CR2 value
  smp: Warn on function calls from softirq context
  KVM: x86: Add fixed counters to PMU filter
  KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
  KVM: VMX: dump VMCS on failed entry
  KVM: x86/vPMU: refine kvm_pmu err msg when event creation failed
  KVM: s390: Use kvm_vcpu_wake_up in kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup
  KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts
  KVM: selftests: Remove superfluous define from vmx.c
  ...

4 files changed, 47 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
index 7869c67e5b6b..37740e992cfa 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ menuconfig HWSPINLOCK
 config HWSPINLOCK_OMAP
 	tristate "OMAP Hardware Spinlock device"
 	depends on HWSPINLOCK
-	depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5 || SOC_DRA7XX || SOC_AM33XX || SOC_AM43XX
+	depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5 || SOC_DRA7XX || SOC_AM33XX || SOC_AM43XX || ARCH_K3
 	help
 	  Say y here to support the OMAP Hardware Spinlock device (firstly
 	  introduced in OMAP4).
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
index 2bad40d42210..8862445aa858 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)    "%s: " fmt, __func__
 
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
@@ -23,6 +24,9 @@
 
 #include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
 
+/* retry delay used in atomic context */
+#define HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US	100
+
 /* radix tree tags */
 #define HWSPINLOCK_UNUSED	(0) /* tags an hwspinlock as unused */
 
@@ -68,11 +72,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(hwspinlock_tree_lock);
  * user need some time-consuming or sleepable operations under the hardware
  * lock, they need one sleepable lock (like mutex) to protect the operations.
  *
- * If the mode is not HWLOCK_RAW, upon a successful return from this function,
- * preemption (and possibly interrupts) is disabled, so the caller must not
- * sleep, and is advised to release the hwspinlock as soon as possible. This is
- * required in order to minimize remote cores polling on the hardware
- * interconnect.
+ * If the mode is neither HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC nor HWLOCK_RAW, upon a successful
+ * return from this function, preemption (and possibly interrupts) is disabled,
+ * so the caller must not sleep, and is advised to release the hwspinlock as
+ * soon as possible. This is required in order to minimize remote cores polling
+ * on the hardware interconnect.
  *
  * The user decides whether local interrupts are disabled or not, and if yes,
  * whether he wants their previous state to be saved. It is up to the user
@@ -112,6 +116,7 @@ int __hwspin_trylock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 		ret = spin_trylock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
 		break;
 	case HWLOCK_RAW:
+	case HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC:
 		ret = 1;
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -136,6 +141,7 @@ int __hwspin_trylock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 			spin_unlock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
 			break;
 		case HWLOCK_RAW:
+		case HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC:
 			/* Nothing to do */
 			break;
 		default:
@@ -179,11 +185,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__hwspin_trylock);
  * user need some time-consuming or sleepable operations under the hardware
  * lock, they need one sleepable lock (like mutex) to protect the operations.
  *
- * If the mode is not HWLOCK_RAW, upon a successful return from this function,
- * preemption is disabled (and possibly local interrupts, too), so the caller
- * must not sleep, and is advised to release the hwspinlock as soon as possible.
- * This is required in order to minimize remote cores polling on the
- * hardware interconnect.
+ * If the mode is HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC (called from an atomic context) the timeout
+ * is handled with busy-waiting delays, hence shall not exceed few msecs.
+ *
+ * If the mode is neither HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC nor HWLOCK_RAW, upon a successful
+ * return from this function, preemption (and possibly interrupts) is disabled,
+ * so the caller must not sleep, and is advised to release the hwspinlock as
+ * soon as possible. This is required in order to minimize remote cores polling
+ * on the hardware interconnect.
  *
  * The user decides whether local interrupts are disabled or not, and if yes,
  * whether he wants their previous state to be saved. It is up to the user
@@ -198,7 +207,7 @@ int __hwspin_lock_timeout(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, unsigned int to,
 					int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 {
 	int ret;
-	unsigned long expire;
+	unsigned long expire, atomic_delay = 0;
 
 	expire = msecs_to_jiffies(to) + jiffies;
 
@@ -212,8 +221,15 @@ int __hwspin_lock_timeout(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, unsigned int to,
 		 * The lock is already taken, let's check if the user wants
 		 * us to try again
 		 */
-		if (time_is_before_eq_jiffies(expire))
-			return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		if (mode == HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC) {
+			udelay(HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US);
+			atomic_delay += HWSPINLOCK_RETRY_DELAY_US;
+			if (atomic_delay > to * 1000)
+				return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		} else {
+			if (time_is_before_eq_jiffies(expire))
+				return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * Allow platform-specific relax handlers to prevent
@@ -276,6 +292,7 @@ void __hwspin_unlock(struct hwspinlock *hwlock, int mode, unsigned long *flags)
 		spin_unlock_irq(&hwlock->lock);
 		break;
 	case HWLOCK_RAW:
+	case HWLOCK_IN_ATOMIC:
 		/* Nothing to do */
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -333,6 +350,11 @@ int of_hwspin_lock_get_id(struct device_node *np, int index)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (!of_device_is_available(args.np)) {
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	/* Find the hwspinlock device: we need its base_id */
 	ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
 	rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 625844e0abef..14e1a532ebb5 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto reg_fail;
 
+	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registered %d locks with HwSpinlock core\n",
+		num_locks);
+
 	return 0;
 
 reg_fail:
@@ -171,6 +174,7 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "ti,omap4-hwspinlock", },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,am654-hwspinlock", },
 	{ /* end */ },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_hwspinlock_of_match);
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
index 441839288893..c8eacf4f9692 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -42,9 +43,15 @@ static void stm32_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
 	writel(STM32_MUTEX_COREID, lock_addr);
 }
 
+static void stm32_hwspinlock_relax(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+	ndelay(50);
+}
+
 static const struct hwspinlock_ops stm32_hwspinlock_ops = {
 	.trylock	= stm32_hwspinlock_trylock,
 	.unlock		= stm32_hwspinlock_unlock,
+	.relax		= stm32_hwspinlock_relax,
 };
 
 static int stm32_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)