diff options
| author | Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> | 2023-07-25 13:39:12 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2023-08-01 13:45:08 +0200 |
| commit | 16e95a62eed18864aecac404f1e4eed764c363f2 (patch) | |
| tree | 70d77f724539bb5a1ca8163dacc97bd6713f1876 /drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | |
| parent | 5d0c230f1de8c7515b6567d9afba1f196fb4e2f4 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-16e95a62eed18864aecac404f1e4eed764c363f2.tar.gz linux-stable-16e95a62eed18864aecac404f1e4eed764c363f2.tar.bz2 linux-stable-16e95a62eed18864aecac404f1e4eed764c363f2.zip | |
powercap: intel_rapl: Fix a sparse warning in TPMI interface
Depends on the interface used, the RAPL registers can be either MSR
indexes or memory mapped IO addresses. Current RAPL common code uses u64
to save both MSR and memory mapped IO registers. With this, when
handling register address with an __iomem annotation, it triggers a
sparse warning like below:
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected unsigned long long [usertype] *tpmi_rapl_regs @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: expected unsigned long long [usertype] *tpmi_rapl_regs
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c:141:41: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *
Fix the problem by using a union to save the registers instead.
Suggested-by: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307031405.dy3druuy-lkp@intel.com/
Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c index 4e646e5e48f6..8fac57b28f8a 100644 --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int rapl_read_data_raw(struct rapl_domain *rd, return -EINVAL; ra.reg = rd->regs[rpi->id]; - if (!ra.reg) + if (!ra.reg.val) return -EINVAL; /* non-hardware data are collected by the polling thread */ @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static int rapl_read_data_raw(struct rapl_domain *rd, ra.mask = rpi->mask; if (rd->rp->priv->read_raw(get_rid(rd->rp), &ra)) { - pr_debug("failed to read reg 0x%llx for %s:%s\n", ra.reg, rd->rp->name, rd->name); + pr_debug("failed to read reg 0x%llx for %s:%s\n", ra.reg.val, rd->rp->name, rd->name); return -EIO; } @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int rapl_check_unit_core(struct rapl_domain *rd) ra.mask = ~0; if (rd->rp->priv->read_raw(get_rid(rd->rp), &ra)) { pr_err("Failed to read power unit REG 0x%llx on %s:%s, exit.\n", - ra.reg, rd->rp->name, rd->name); + ra.reg.val, rd->rp->name, rd->name); return -ENODEV; } @@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ static int rapl_check_unit_atom(struct rapl_domain *rd) ra.mask = ~0; if (rd->rp->priv->read_raw(get_rid(rd->rp), &ra)) { pr_err("Failed to read power unit REG 0x%llx on %s:%s, exit.\n", - ra.reg, rd->rp->name, rd->name); + ra.reg.val, rd->rp->name, rd->name); return -ENODEV; } @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int rapl_check_unit_tpmi(struct rapl_domain *rd) ra.mask = ~0; if (rd->rp->priv->read_raw(get_rid(rd->rp), &ra)) { pr_err("Failed to read power unit REG 0x%llx on %s:%s, exit.\n", - ra.reg, rd->rp->name, rd->name); + ra.reg.val, rd->rp->name, rd->name); return -ENODEV; } @@ -1411,8 +1411,8 @@ static int rapl_get_domain_unit(struct rapl_domain *rd) struct rapl_defaults *defaults = get_defaults(rd->rp); int ret; - if (!rd->regs[RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_UNIT]) { - if (!rd->rp->priv->reg_unit) { + if (!rd->regs[RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_UNIT].val) { + if (!rd->rp->priv->reg_unit.val) { pr_err("No valid Unit register found\n"); return -ENODEV; } |