diff options
author | Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> | 2011-07-08 08:19:20 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> | 2011-07-08 08:19:20 +0200 |
commit | 55c022bbddb2c056b5dff1bd1b1758d31b6d64c9 (patch) | |
tree | fdd3aa29a1407bbd19b8efe47b2538544da85a70 /fs/affs | |
parent | 719c0c590609809365c6f3da2f923cd84dc99113 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-55c022bbddb2c056b5dff1bd1b1758d31b6d64c9.tar.gz linux-stable-55c022bbddb2c056b5dff1bd1b1758d31b6d64c9.tar.bz2 linux-stable-55c022bbddb2c056b5dff1bd1b1758d31b6d64c9.zip |
block: avoid building too big plug list
When I test fio script with big I/O depth, I found the total throughput drops
compared to some relative small I/O depth. The reason is the thread accumulates
big requests in its plug list and causes some delays (surely this depends
on CPU speed).
I thought we'd better have a threshold for requests. When a threshold reaches,
this means there is no request merge and queue lock contention isn't severe
when pushing per-task requests to queue, so the main advantages of blk plug
don't exist. We can force a plug list flush in this case.
With this, my test throughput actually increases and almost equals to small
I/O depth. Another side effect is irq off time decreases in blk_flush_plug_list()
for big I/O depth.
The BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT is choosen arbitarily, but 16 is efficiently to
reduce lock contention to me. But I'm open here, 32 is ok in my test too.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/affs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions