summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>2024-01-16 13:29:59 -0500
committerKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>2024-01-21 13:27:10 -0500
commitec4edd7b9d2038a97e0ba3fad8fc8492b0d12d35 (patch)
tree2ba47c4de8460460489d335e3f562eab8819ce96 /fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c
parent2acc59dd88d27ad69b66ded80df16c042b04eeec (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-ec4edd7b9d2038a97e0ba3fad8fc8492b0d12d35.tar.gz
linux-stable-ec4edd7b9d2038a97e0ba3fad8fc8492b0d12d35.tar.bz2
linux-stable-ec4edd7b9d2038a97e0ba3fad8fc8492b0d12d35.zip
bcachefs: Prep work for variable size btree node buffers
bcachefs btree nodes are big - typically 256k - and btree roots are pinned in memory. As we're now up to 18 btrees, we now have significant memory overhead in mostly empty btree roots. And in the future we're going to start enforcing that certain btree node boundaries exist, to solve lock contention issues - analagous to XFS's AGIs. Thus, we need to start allocating smaller btree node buffers when we can. This patch changes code that refers to the filesystem constant c->opts.btree_node_size to refer to the btree node buffer size - btree_buf_bytes() - where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c
index 44f9dfa28a09..17a5938aa71a 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_update_interior.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static bool bch2_btree_node_format_fits(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
{
size_t u64s = btree_node_u64s_with_format(nr, &b->format, new_f);
- return __vstruct_bytes(struct btree_node, u64s) < btree_bytes(c);
+ return __vstruct_bytes(struct btree_node, u64s) < btree_buf_bytes(b);
}
/* Btree node freeing/allocation: */
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ bch2_btree_update_start(struct btree_trans *trans, struct btree_path *path,
* Always check for space for two keys, even if we won't have to
* split at prior level - it might have been a merge instead:
*/
- if (bch2_btree_node_insert_fits(c, path->l[update_level].b,
+ if (bch2_btree_node_insert_fits(path->l[update_level].b,
BKEY_BTREE_PTR_U64s_MAX * 2))
break;
@@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ static void __btree_split_node(struct btree_update *as,
unsigned u64s = nr_keys[i].nr_keys * n[i]->data->format.key_u64s +
nr_keys[i].val_u64s;
- if (__vstruct_bytes(struct btree_node, u64s) > btree_bytes(as->c))
+ if (__vstruct_bytes(struct btree_node, u64s) > btree_buf_bytes(b))
n[i]->data->format = b->format;
btree_node_set_format(n[i], n[i]->data->format);
@@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ static int bch2_btree_insert_node(struct btree_update *as, struct btree_trans *t
bch2_btree_node_prep_for_write(trans, path, b);
- if (!bch2_btree_node_insert_fits(c, b, bch2_keylist_u64s(keys))) {
+ if (!bch2_btree_node_insert_fits(b, bch2_keylist_u64s(keys))) {
bch2_btree_node_unlock_write(trans, path, b);
goto split;
}