summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/f2fs/segment.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>2014-01-08 10:09:51 +0900
committerJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>2014-01-08 11:16:20 +0900
commitfb5566da9181d33ecdd9892e44f90320e7d4cc9f (patch)
treed3b1656ec7e454ea2d831f673a538f2f78d1f85a /fs/f2fs/segment.c
parent04a17fb17fafada39f96bfb41ceb2dc1c11b2af6 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-fb5566da9181d33ecdd9892e44f90320e7d4cc9f.tar.gz
linux-stable-fb5566da9181d33ecdd9892e44f90320e7d4cc9f.tar.bz2
linux-stable-fb5566da9181d33ecdd9892e44f90320e7d4cc9f.zip
f2fs: improve write performance under frequent fsync calls
When considering a bunch of data writes with very frequent fsync calls, we are able to think the following performance regression. N: Node IO, D: Data IO, IO scheduler: cfq Issue pending IOs D1 D2 D3 D4 D1 D2 D3 D4 N1 D2 D3 D4 N1 N2 N1 D3 D4 N2 D1 --> N1 can be selected by cfq becase of the same priority of N and D. Then D3 and D4 would be delayed, resuling in performance degradation. So, when processing the fsync call, it'd better give higher priority to data IOs than node IOs by assigning WRITE and WRITE_SYNC respectively. This patch improves the random wirte performance with frequent fsync calls by up to 10%. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/f2fs/segment.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/f2fs/segment.c8
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 555ae7693ea0..5f84639354e3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -924,16 +924,12 @@ void write_meta_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page)
}
void write_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
+ struct f2fs_io_info *fio,
unsigned int nid, block_t old_blkaddr, block_t *new_blkaddr)
{
struct f2fs_summary sum;
- struct f2fs_io_info fio = {
- .type = NODE,
- .rw = WRITE_SYNC,
- };
-
set_summary(&sum, nid, 0, 0);
- do_write_page(sbi, page, old_blkaddr, new_blkaddr, &sum, &fio);
+ do_write_page(sbi, page, old_blkaddr, new_blkaddr, &sum, fio);
}
void write_data_page(struct page *page, struct dnode_of_data *dn,