diff options
author | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> | 2023-09-14 11:21:39 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-09-19 13:21:34 -0700 |
commit | 9ea9cb00a82b53ec39630eac718776d37e41b35a (patch) | |
tree | cbdf3933fa7a9000471fed4ef6748b285a2c3696 /include/linux/memcontrol.h | |
parent | 0c7752d5b1ac62c8b926c907f34073ef7e9ad42b (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-9ea9cb00a82b53ec39630eac718776d37e41b35a.tar.gz linux-stable-9ea9cb00a82b53ec39630eac718776d37e41b35a.tar.bz2 linux-stable-9ea9cb00a82b53ec39630eac718776d37e41b35a.zip |
mm: memcontrol: fix GFP_NOFS recursion in memory.high enforcement
Breno and Josef report a deadlock scenario from cgroup reclaim
re-entering the filesystem:
[ 361.546690] ======================================================
[ 361.559210] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 361.571703] 6.5.0-0_fbk700_debug_rc0_kbuilder_13159_gbf787a128001 #1 Tainted: G S E
[ 361.589704] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 361.602277] find/9315 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 361.611625] ffff88837ba140c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x68/0x4f0
[ 361.631437]
[ 361.631437] but task is already holding lock:
[ 361.643243] ffff8881765b8678 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x1e/0x40
[ 362.904457] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x30
[ 362.912414] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x68/0x4f0
[ 362.922460] btrfs_evict_inode+0x301/0x770
[ 362.982726] evict+0x17c/0x380
[ 362.988944] prune_icache_sb+0x100/0x1d0
[ 363.005559] super_cache_scan+0x1f8/0x260
[ 363.013695] do_shrink_slab+0x2a2/0x540
[ 363.021489] shrink_slab_memcg+0x237/0x3d0
[ 363.050606] shrink_slab+0xa7/0x240
[ 363.083382] shrink_node_memcgs+0x262/0x3b0
[ 363.091870] shrink_node+0x1a4/0x720
[ 363.099150] shrink_zones+0x1f6/0x5d0
[ 363.148798] do_try_to_free_pages+0x19b/0x5e0
[ 363.157633] try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0x266/0x370
[ 363.190575] reclaim_high+0x16f/0x1f0
[ 363.208409] mem_cgroup_handle_over_high+0x10b/0x270
[ 363.246678] try_charge_memcg+0xaf2/0xc70
[ 363.304151] charge_memcg+0xf0/0x350
[ 363.320070] __mem_cgroup_charge+0x28/0x40
[ 363.328371] __filemap_add_folio+0x870/0xd50
[ 363.371303] filemap_add_folio+0xdd/0x310
[ 363.399696] __filemap_get_folio+0x2fc/0x7d0
[ 363.419086] pagecache_get_page+0xe/0x30
[ 363.427048] alloc_extent_buffer+0x1cd/0x6a0
[ 363.435704] read_tree_block+0x43/0xc0
[ 363.443316] read_block_for_search+0x361/0x510
[ 363.466690] btrfs_search_slot+0xc8c/0x1520
This is caused by the mem_cgroup_handle_over_high() not respecting the
gfp_mask of the allocation context. We used to only call this function on
resume to userspace, where no locks were held. But c9afe31ec443 ("memcg:
synchronously enforce memory.high for large overcharges") added a call
from the allocation context without considering the gfp.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914152139.100822-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Fixes: c9afe31ec443 ("memcg: synchronously enforce memory.high for large overcharges")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.17+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/memcontrol.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index ab94ad4597d0..e4e24da16d2c 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, return READ_ONCE(mz->lru_zone_size[zone_idx][lru]); } -void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(void); +void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(gfp_t gfp_mask); unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_unlock_pages(void) rcu_read_unlock(); } -static inline void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(void) +static inline void mem_cgroup_handle_over_high(gfp_t gfp_mask) { } |