diff options
author | Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> | 2022-03-04 11:16:54 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-03-05 18:38:15 -0800 |
commit | bff61f6faedb36db6b135da898840d29aa74cbbb (patch) | |
tree | 9b32b35f03440d1cedbca2f554e713891c8c1e4e /kernel/bpf | |
parent | 401af75c4975759d45c3627a7588351b4ab3e2a8 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-bff61f6faedb36db6b135da898840d29aa74cbbb.tar.gz linux-stable-bff61f6faedb36db6b135da898840d29aa74cbbb.tar.bz2 linux-stable-bff61f6faedb36db6b135da898840d29aa74cbbb.zip |
bpf: Fix checking PTR_TO_BTF_ID in check_mem_access
With the introduction of MEM_USER in
commit c6f1bfe89ac9 ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way")
PTR_TO_BTF_ID can be combined with a MEM_USER tag. Therefore, most
likely, when we compare reg_type against PTR_TO_BTF_ID, we want to use
the reg's base_type. Previously the check in check_mem_access() wants
to say: if the reg is BTF_ID but not NULL, the execution flow falls
into the 'then' branch. But now a reg of (BTF_ID | MEM_USER), which
should go into the 'then' branch, goes into the 'else'.
The end results before and after this patch are the same: regs tagged
with MEM_USER get rejected, but not in a way we intended. So fix the
condition, the error message now is correct.
Before (log from commit 696c39011538):
$ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3
...
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_'
Now:
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
R1 type=ctx expected=fp
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 104036 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1'
1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,ref_obj_id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access user memory: off=0
Note the error message for the reason of rejection.
Fixes: c6f1bfe89ac9 ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-2-haoluo@google.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index fe9a513e2314..7a6b58fea37d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4562,7 +4562,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn err = check_tp_buffer_access(env, reg, regno, off, size); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); - } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_BTF_ID) { + } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID && + !type_may_be_null(reg->type)) { err = check_ptr_to_btf_access(env, regs, regno, off, size, t, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_MAP) { |