locking/lockdep: Decrement IRQ context counters when removing lock chain

There are currently three counters to track the IRQ context of a lock
chain - nr_hardirq_chains, nr_softirq_chains and nr_process_chains.
They are incremented when a new lock chain is added, but they are
not decremented when a lock chain is removed. That causes some of the
statistic counts reported by /proc/lockdep_stats to be incorrect.
IRQ
Fix that by decrementing the right counter when a lock chain is removed.

Since inc_chains() no longer accesses hardirq_context and softirq_context
directly, it is moved out from the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS conditional
compilation block.

Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-2-longman@redhat.com

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 32406ef0d6a2..35449f5b79fb 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2298,18 +2298,6 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void inc_chains(void)
-{
-	if (current->hardirq_context)
-		nr_hardirq_chains++;
-	else {
-		if (current->softirq_context)
-			nr_softirq_chains++;
-		else
-			nr_process_chains++;
-	}
-}
-
 #else
 
 static inline int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr,
@@ -2317,13 +2305,27 @@ static inline int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr,
 {
 	return 1;
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
 
-static inline void inc_chains(void)
+static void inc_chains(int irq_context)
 {
-	nr_process_chains++;
+	if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
+		nr_hardirq_chains++;
+	else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
+		nr_softirq_chains++;
+	else
+		nr_process_chains++;
 }
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
+static void dec_chains(int irq_context)
+{
+	if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
+		nr_hardirq_chains--;
+	else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
+		nr_softirq_chains--;
+	else
+		nr_process_chains--;
+}
 
 static void
 print_deadlock_scenario(struct held_lock *nxt, struct held_lock *prv)
@@ -2843,7 +2845,7 @@ static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
 
 	hlist_add_head_rcu(&chain->entry, hash_head);
 	debug_atomic_inc(chain_lookup_misses);
-	inc_chains();
+	inc_chains(chain->irq_context);
 
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -3596,7 +3598,8 @@ lock_used:
 
 static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	return 2 * !!task->hardirq_context + !!task->softirq_context;
+	return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->hardirq_context +
+	       LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->softirq_context;
 }
 
 static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
@@ -4798,6 +4801,8 @@ recalc:
 		return;
 	/* Overwrite the chain key for concurrent RCU readers. */
 	WRITE_ONCE(chain->chain_key, chain_key);
+	dec_chains(chain->irq_context);
+
 	/*
 	 * Note: calling hlist_del_rcu() from inside a
 	 * hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() loop is safe.
@@ -4819,6 +4824,7 @@ recalc:
 	}
 	*new_chain = *chain;
 	hlist_add_head_rcu(&new_chain->entry, chainhashentry(chain_key));
+	inc_chains(new_chain->irq_context);
 #endif
 }