summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/params.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>2012-08-23 12:17:36 +0200
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2012-08-23 12:17:36 +0200
commit676ce6d5ca3098339c028d44fe0427d1566a4d2d (patch)
tree64966fcc75687e3367670bbfb32828796f5d3bf0 /kernel/params.c
parent79df9b40b3d0fd275b4d6eae6068706871e95da5 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-676ce6d5ca3098339c028d44fe0427d1566a4d2d.tar.gz
linux-stable-676ce6d5ca3098339c028d44fe0427d1566a4d2d.tar.bz2
linux-stable-676ce6d5ca3098339c028d44fe0427d1566a4d2d.zip
block: replace __getblk_slow misfix by grow_dev_page fix
Commit 91f68c89d8f3 ("block: fix infinite loop in __getblk_slow") is not good: a successful call to grow_buffers() cannot guarantee that the page won't be reclaimed before the immediate next call to __find_get_block(), which is why there was always a loop there. Yesterday I got "EXT4-fs error (device loop0): __ext4_get_inode_loc:3595: inode #19278: block 664: comm cc1: unable to read itable block" on console, which pointed to this commit. I've been trying to bisect for weeks, why kbuild-on-ext4-on-loop-on-tmpfs sometimes fails from a missing header file, under memory pressure on ppc G5. I've never seen this on x86, and I've never seen it on 3.5-rc7 itself, despite that commit being in there: bisection pointed to an irrelevant pinctrl merge, but hard to tell when failure takes between 18 minutes and 38 hours (but so far it's happened quicker on 3.6-rc2). (I've since found such __ext4_get_inode_loc errors in /var/log/messages from previous weeks: why the message never appeared on console until yesterday morning is a mystery for another day.) Revert 91f68c89d8f3, restoring __getblk_slow() to how it was (plus a checkpatch nitfix). Simplify the interface between grow_buffers() and grow_dev_page(), and avoid the infinite loop beyond end of device by instead checking init_page_buffers()'s end_block there (I presume that's more efficient than a repeated call to blkdev_max_block()), returning -ENXIO to __getblk_slow() in that case. And remove akpm's ten-year-old "__getblk() cannot fail ... weird" comment, but that is worrying: are all users of __getblk() really now prepared for a NULL bh beyond end of device, or will some oops?? Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5 Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/params.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions