summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/printk
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>2021-06-17 11:56:51 +0206
committerPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>2021-06-22 09:57:15 +0200
commit3342aa8e6b4f6e3f1521e9b4cf5cfe50dbc37774 (patch)
tree40f06e36bcbedf876fa6d3b8b1ebb2713ee7aec7 /kernel/printk
parent766c268bc6d39b8124e50d075a36b8a3305bc8e2 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-3342aa8e6b4f6e3f1521e9b4cf5cfe50dbc37774.tar.gz
linux-stable-3342aa8e6b4f6e3f1521e9b4cf5cfe50dbc37774.tar.bz2
linux-stable-3342aa8e6b4f6e3f1521e9b4cf5cfe50dbc37774.zip
printk: fix cpu lock ordering
The cpu lock implementation uses a full memory barrier to take the lock, but no memory barriers when releasing the lock. This means that changes performed by a lock owner may not be seen by the next lock owner. This may have been "good enough" for use by dump_stack() as a serialization mechanism, but it is not enough to provide proper protection for a critical section. Correct this problem by using acquire/release memory barriers for lock/unlock, respectively. Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617095051.4808-3-john.ogness@linutronix.de
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/printk')
-rw-r--r--kernel/printk/printk.c53
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 9dfad0efb67f..142a58d124d9 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3568,10 +3568,33 @@ int __printk_cpu_trylock(void)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
- old = atomic_cmpxchg(&printk_cpulock_owner, -1, cpu);
+ /*
+ * Guarantee loads and stores from this CPU when it is the lock owner
+ * are _not_ visible to the previous lock owner. This pairs with
+ * __printk_cpu_unlock:B.
+ *
+ * Memory barrier involvement:
+ *
+ * If __printk_cpu_trylock:A reads from __printk_cpu_unlock:B, then
+ * __printk_cpu_unlock:A can never read from __printk_cpu_trylock:B.
+ *
+ * Relies on:
+ *
+ * RELEASE from __printk_cpu_unlock:A to __printk_cpu_unlock:B
+ * of the previous CPU
+ * matching
+ * ACQUIRE from __printk_cpu_trylock:A to __printk_cpu_trylock:B
+ * of this CPU
+ */
+ old = atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&printk_cpulock_owner, -1,
+ cpu); /* LMM(__printk_cpu_trylock:A) */
if (old == -1) {
- /* This CPU is now the owner. */
+ /*
+ * This CPU is now the owner and begins loading/storing
+ * data: LMM(__printk_cpu_trylock:B)
+ */
return 1;
+
} else if (old == cpu) {
/* This CPU is already the owner. */
atomic_inc(&printk_cpulock_nested);
@@ -3596,7 +3619,31 @@ void __printk_cpu_unlock(void)
return;
}
- atomic_set(&printk_cpulock_owner, -1);
+ /*
+ * This CPU is finished loading/storing data:
+ * LMM(__printk_cpu_unlock:A)
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * Guarantee loads and stores from this CPU when it was the
+ * lock owner are visible to the next lock owner. This pairs
+ * with __printk_cpu_trylock:A.
+ *
+ * Memory barrier involvement:
+ *
+ * If __printk_cpu_trylock:A reads from __printk_cpu_unlock:B,
+ * then __printk_cpu_trylock:B reads from __printk_cpu_unlock:A.
+ *
+ * Relies on:
+ *
+ * RELEASE from __printk_cpu_unlock:A to __printk_cpu_unlock:B
+ * of this CPU
+ * matching
+ * ACQUIRE from __printk_cpu_trylock:A to __printk_cpu_trylock:B
+ * of the next CPU
+ */
+ atomic_set_release(&printk_cpulock_owner,
+ -1); /* LMM(__printk_cpu_unlock:B) */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__printk_cpu_unlock);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */