summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>2021-08-09 14:52:29 -0700
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2021-08-10 13:09:28 +0200
commit019d0454c61707879cf9853c894e0a191f6b9774 (patch)
treed44bdf1fae793feb2d33a808bbe402f5c6bc84de /kernel
parenta2baf4e8bb0f306fbed7b5e6197c02896a638ab5 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-019d0454c61707879cf9853c894e0a191f6b9774.tar.gz
linux-stable-019d0454c61707879cf9853c894e0a191f6b9774.tar.bz2
linux-stable-019d0454c61707879cf9853c894e0a191f6b9774.zip
bpf, core: Fix kernel-doc notation
Fix kernel-doc warnings in kernel/bpf/core.c (found by scripts/kernel-doc and W=1 builds). That is, correct a function name in a comment and add return descriptions for 2 functions. Fixes these kernel-doc warnings: kernel/bpf/core.c:1372: warning: expecting prototype for __bpf_prog_run(). Prototype was for ___bpf_prog_run() instead kernel/bpf/core.c:1372: warning: No description found for return value of '___bpf_prog_run' kernel/bpf/core.c:1883: warning: No description found for return value of 'bpf_prog_select_runtime' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809215229.7556-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/core.c7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index b1a5fc04492b..0a28a8095d3e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1362,11 +1362,13 @@ u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
}
/**
- * __bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context
+ * ___bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context
* @regs: is the array of MAX_BPF_EXT_REG eBPF pseudo-registers
* @insn: is the array of eBPF instructions
*
* Decode and execute eBPF instructions.
+ *
+ * Return: whatever value is in %BPF_R0 at program exit
*/
static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
@@ -1878,6 +1880,9 @@ static void bpf_prog_select_func(struct bpf_prog *fp)
*
* Try to JIT eBPF program, if JIT is not available, use interpreter.
* The BPF program will be executed via BPF_PROG_RUN() macro.
+ *
+ * Return: the &fp argument along with &err set to 0 for success or
+ * a negative errno code on failure
*/
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
{