diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | 2012-05-17 17:15:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2012-05-30 14:02:16 +0200 |
commit | 5aaa0b7a2ed5b12692c9ffb5222182bd558d3146 (patch) | |
tree | 0334762e9d0e773acf21e61c682f895c25201c89 /kernel | |
parent | 9f646389aa7727a2fd8f9ae6337b92af9cfbc264 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-5aaa0b7a2ed5b12692c9ffb5222182bd558d3146.tar.gz linux-stable-5aaa0b7a2ed5b12692c9ffb5222182bd558d3146.tar.bz2 linux-stable-5aaa0b7a2ed5b12692c9ffb5222182bd558d3146.zip |
sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load calculations some more
Follow up on commit 556061b00 ("sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load[]
calculations") since while that fixed the busy case it regressed the
mostly idle case.
Add a callback from the nohz exit to also age the rq->cpu_load[]
array. This closes the hole where either there was no nohz load
balance pass during the nohz, or there was a 'significant' amount of
idle time between the last nohz balance and the nohz exit.
So we'll update unconditionally from the tick to not insert any
accidental 0 load periods while busy, and we try and catch up from
nohz idle balance and nohz exit. Both these are still prone to missing
a jiffy, but that has always been the case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kt0trz0apodbf84ucjfdbr1a@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 53 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 |
2 files changed, 44 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 39eb6011bc38..75844a8f9aeb 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2517,25 +2517,32 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load, sched_avg_update(this_rq); } +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ +/* + * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the + * cpu doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the cpu doing the jiffy reading + * causing off-by-one errors in observed deltas; {0,2} instead of {1,1}. + * + * Therefore we cannot use the delta approach from the regular tick since that + * would seriously skew the load calculation. However we'll make do for those + * updates happening while idle (nohz_idle_balance) or coming out of idle + * (tick_nohz_idle_exit). + * + * This means we might still be one tick off for nohz periods. + */ + /* * Called from nohz_idle_balance() to update the load ratings before doing the * idle balance. */ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq) { - unsigned long curr_jiffies = jiffies; + unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies); unsigned long load = this_rq->load.weight; unsigned long pending_updates; /* - * Bloody broken means of dealing with nohz, but better than nothing.. - * jiffies is updated by one cpu, another cpu can drift wrt the jiffy - * update and see 0 difference the one time and 2 the next, even though - * we ticked at roughtly the same rate. - * - * Hence we only use this from nohz_idle_balance() and skip this - * nonsense when called from the scheduler_tick() since that's - * guaranteed a stable rate. + * bail if there's load or we're actually up-to-date. */ if (load || curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick) return; @@ -2547,12 +2554,38 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq) } /* + * Called from tick_nohz_idle_exit() -- try and fix up the ticks we missed. + */ +void update_cpu_load_nohz(void) +{ + struct rq *this_rq = this_rq(); + unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies); + unsigned long pending_updates; + + if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick) + return; + + raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock); + pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick; + if (pending_updates) { + this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies; + /* + * We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be + * !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort. + */ + __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates); + } + raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */ + +/* * Called from scheduler_tick() */ static void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq) { /* - * See the mess in update_idle_cpu_load(). + * See the mess around update_idle_cpu_load() / update_cpu_load_nohz(). */ this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies; __update_cpu_load(this_rq, this_rq->load.weight, 1); diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 6a3a5b9ff561..0c927cd85345 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -576,6 +576,7 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_exit(void) /* Update jiffies first */ select_nohz_load_balancer(0); tick_do_update_jiffies64(now); + update_cpu_load_nohz(); #ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING /* |