summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2023-09-18 14:01:10 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2023-09-20 03:26:25 -0700
commit81335f90e8a88b81932df011105c46e708744f44 (patch)
tree0a13b2a8d05d69f718ca73660e6431db866d2f0e /kernel
parentb724a6418f1f853bcb39c8923bf14a50c7bdbd07 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-81335f90e8a88b81932df011105c46e708744f44.tar.gz
linux-stable-81335f90e8a88b81932df011105c46e708744f44.tar.bz2
linux-stable-81335f90e8a88b81932df011105c46e708744f44.zip
bpf: unconditionally reset backtrack_state masks on global func exit
In mark_chain_precision() logic, when we reach the entry to a global func, it is expected that R1-R5 might be still requested to be marked precise. This would correspond to some integer input arguments being tracked as precise. This is all expected and handled as a special case. What's not expected is that we'll leave backtrack_state structure with some register bits set. This is because for subsequent precision propagations backtrack_state is reused without clearing masks, as all code paths are carefully written in a way to leave empty backtrack_state with zeroed out masks, for speed. The fix is trivial, we always clear register bit in the register mask, and then, optionally, set reg->precise if register is SCALAR_VALUE type. Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com> Fixes: be2ef8161572 ("bpf: allow precision tracking for programs with subprogs") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918210110.2241458-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c8
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bb78212fa5b2..c0c7d137066a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4047,11 +4047,9 @@ static int __mark_chain_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
bitmap_from_u64(mask, bt_reg_mask(bt));
for_each_set_bit(i, mask, 32) {
reg = &st->frame[0]->regs[i];
- if (reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
- bt_clear_reg(bt, i);
- continue;
- }
- reg->precise = true;
+ bt_clear_reg(bt, i);
+ if (reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE)
+ reg->precise = true;
}
return 0;
}