diff options
author | Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> | 2022-05-24 10:12:27 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2022-05-28 01:09:18 +0200 |
commit | caff1fa4118cec4dfd4336521ebd22a6408a1e3e (patch) | |
tree | ba16928b65f6737879edd91826550a47f8fb1b16 /kernel | |
parent | 59ed76fe2f981bccde37bdddb465f260a96a2404 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-caff1fa4118cec4dfd4336521ebd22a6408a1e3e.tar.gz linux-stable-caff1fa4118cec4dfd4336521ebd22a6408a1e3e.tar.bz2 linux-stable-caff1fa4118cec4dfd4336521ebd22a6408a1e3e.zip |
bpf: Fix probe read error in ___bpf_prog_run()
I think there is something wrong with BPF_PROBE_MEM in ___bpf_prog_run()
in big-endian machine. Let's make a test and see what will happen if we
want to load a 'u16' with BPF_PROBE_MEM.
Let's make the src value '0x0001', the value of dest register will become
0x0001000000000000, as the value will be loaded to the first 2 byte of
DST with following code:
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, SIZE, (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off));
Obviously, the value in DST is not correct. In fact, we can compare
BPF_PROBE_MEM with LDX_MEM_H:
DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off);
If the memory load is done by LDX_MEM_H, the value in DST will be 0x1 now.
And I think this error results in the test case 'test_bpf_sk_storage_map'
failing:
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:bpf_iter_bpf_sk_storage_map__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:socket 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:map_update 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:create_iter 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:PASS:read 0 nsec
test_bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL:ipv6_sk_count got 0 expected 3
$10/26 bpf_iter/bpf_sk_storage_map:FAIL
The code of the test case is simply, it will load sk->sk_family to the
register with BPF_PROBE_MEM and check if it is AF_INET6. With this patch,
now the test case 'bpf_iter' can pass:
$10 bpf_iter:OK
Fixes: 2a02759ef5f8 ("bpf: Add support for BTF pointers to interpreter")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220524021228.533216-1-imagedong@tencent.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index cacd8684c3c4..5f6f3f829b36 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1953,6 +1953,11 @@ out: CONT; \ LDX_MEM_##SIZEOP: \ DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off); \ + CONT; \ + LDX_PROBE_MEM_##SIZEOP: \ + bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \ + (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \ + DST = *((SIZE *)&DST); \ CONT; LDST(B, u8) @@ -1960,15 +1965,6 @@ out: LDST(W, u32) LDST(DW, u64) #undef LDST -#define LDX_PROBE(SIZEOP, SIZE) \ - LDX_PROBE_MEM_##SIZEOP: \ - bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, SIZE, (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \ - CONT; - LDX_PROBE(B, 1) - LDX_PROBE(H, 2) - LDX_PROBE(W, 4) - LDX_PROBE(DW, 8) -#undef LDX_PROBE #define ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BOP, KOP) \ case BOP: \ |