diff options
author | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> | 2019-11-05 21:16:51 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-11-06 08:47:50 -0800 |
commit | 1be334e5c0886197cc82923ff0ac5836111b7b57 (patch) | |
tree | 9bc1c0af912b0b630c6ca69a2466705dc00785fd /mm/page_alloc.c | |
parent | ec649c9d454ea372dcf16cccf48250994f1d7788 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-1be334e5c0886197cc82923ff0ac5836111b7b57.tar.gz linux-stable-1be334e5c0886197cc82923ff0ac5836111b7b57.tar.bz2 linux-stable-1be334e5c0886197cc82923ff0ac5836111b7b57.zip |
mm/page_alloc.c: ratelimit allocation failure warnings more aggressively
While investigating a bug related to higher atomic allocation failures,
we noticed the failure warnings positively drowning the console, and in
our case trigger lockup warnings because of a serial console too slow to
handle all that output.
But even if we had a faster console, it's unclear what additional
information the current level of repetition provides.
Allocation failures happen for three reasons: The machine is OOM, the VM
is failing to handle reasonable requests, or somebody is making
unreasonable requests (and didn't acknowledge their opportunism with
__GFP_NOWARN). Having the memory dump, a callstack, and the ratelimit
stats on skipped failure warnings should provide enough information to
let users/admins/developers know whether something is wrong and point
them in the right direction for debugging, bpftracing etc.
Limit allocation failure warnings to one spew every ten seconds.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191028194906.26899-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page_alloc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/page_alloc.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 6c717ad5f5c5..f391c0c4ed1d 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -3728,10 +3728,6 @@ try_this_zone: static void warn_alloc_show_mem(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask) { unsigned int filter = SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES; - static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(show_mem_rs, HZ, 1); - - if (!__ratelimit(&show_mem_rs)) - return; /* * This documents exceptions given to allocations in certain @@ -3752,8 +3748,7 @@ void warn_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, const char *fmt, ...) { struct va_format vaf; va_list args; - static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(nopage_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, - DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST); + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(nopage_rs, 10*HZ, 1); if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) || !__ratelimit(&nopage_rs)) return; |