Merge Linus master into drm-next

The merge is clean, but the arm build fails afterwards,
due to API changes in the regulator tree.

I've included the patch into the merge to fix the build.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index cd3a5e64cea9..a7251a8ed532 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
 #include <linux/gfp.h>
 #include <linux/uio.h>
+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ int page_cluster;
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_add_pvec);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_rotate_pvecs);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_pvecs);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, lru_deactivate_file_pvecs);
 
 /*
  * This path almost never happens for VM activity - pages are normally
@@ -75,7 +76,14 @@ static void __put_compound_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	compound_page_dtor *dtor;
 
-	__page_cache_release(page);
+	/*
+	 * __page_cache_release() is supposed to be called for thp, not for
+	 * hugetlb. This is because hugetlb page does never have PageLRU set
+	 * (it's never listed to any LRU lists) and no memcg routines should
+	 * be called for hugetlb (it has a separate hugetlb_cgroup.)
+	 */
+	if (!PageHuge(page))
+		__page_cache_release(page);
 	dtor = get_compound_page_dtor(page);
 	(*dtor)(page);
 }
@@ -743,7 +751,7 @@ void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
  * be write it out by flusher threads as this is much more effective
  * than the single-page writeout from reclaim.
  */
-static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
+static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
 			      void *arg)
 {
 	int lru, file;
@@ -811,36 +819,36 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 
-	pvec = &per_cpu(lru_deactivate_pvecs, cpu);
+	pvec = &per_cpu(lru_deactivate_file_pvecs, cpu);
 	if (pagevec_count(pvec))
-		pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, lru_deactivate_fn, NULL);
+		pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, lru_deactivate_file_fn, NULL);
 
 	activate_page_drain(cpu);
 }
 
 /**
- * deactivate_page - forcefully deactivate a page
+ * deactivate_file_page - forcefully deactivate a file page
  * @page: page to deactivate
  *
  * This function hints the VM that @page is a good reclaim candidate,
  * for example if its invalidation fails due to the page being dirty
  * or under writeback.
  */
-void deactivate_page(struct page *page)
+void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	/*
-	 * In a workload with many unevictable page such as mprotect, unevictable
-	 * page deactivation for accelerating reclaim is pointless.
+	 * In a workload with many unevictable page such as mprotect,
+	 * unevictable page deactivation for accelerating reclaim is pointless.
 	 */
 	if (PageUnevictable(page))
 		return;
 
 	if (likely(get_page_unless_zero(page))) {
-		struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(lru_deactivate_pvecs);
+		struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(lru_deactivate_file_pvecs);
 
 		if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page))
-			pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, lru_deactivate_fn, NULL);
-		put_cpu_var(lru_deactivate_pvecs);
+			pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, lru_deactivate_file_fn, NULL);
+		put_cpu_var(lru_deactivate_file_pvecs);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -872,7 +880,7 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void)
 
 		if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_add_pvec, cpu)) ||
 		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
-		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_deactivate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
+		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_deactivate_file_pvecs, cpu)) ||
 		    need_activate_page_drain(cpu)) {
 			INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
 			schedule_work_on(cpu, work);