diff options
author | Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> | 2009-09-08 15:31:46 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> | 2009-09-27 03:12:13 -0400 |
commit | 14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e (patch) | |
tree | ec3b36bc0a274ea382f5816a6919d82a59ac110f /mm | |
parent | b684a3637e0887683a0a3d6fd471fc41d7c1606a (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e.tar.gz linux-stable-14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e.tar.bz2 linux-stable-14f03343ad1080c2fea29ab2c13f05b976c4584e.zip |
ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message
The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The
device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom
API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If
not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example
"thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list).
I propose to reword the message to:
ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
it instead of the native driver
which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome.
I also added a message warning about possible problems and system
instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested
by Len.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions