diff options
| author | Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> | 2023-07-13 12:07:38 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-07-13 16:04:56 -0700 |
| commit | 5e9cf77d81f9ba51019157dc55a3b73dc89a7cf4 (patch) | |
| tree | 09c88c8019209719b63cc0b7fa916e2235a276bd /net/bpf | |
| parent | 473e3150e30a2db4199e6bad68c0be11279d1c34 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-5e9cf77d81f9ba51019157dc55a3b73dc89a7cf4.tar.gz linux-stable-5e9cf77d81f9ba51019157dc55a3b73dc89a7cf4.tar.bz2 linux-stable-5e9cf77d81f9ba51019157dc55a3b73dc89a7cf4.zip | |
selftests/bpf: add testcase for TRACING with 6+ arguments
Add fentry_many_args.c and fexit_many_args.c to test the fentry/fexit
with 7/11 arguments. As this feature is not supported by arm64 yet, we
disable these testcases for arm64 in DENYLIST.aarch64. We can combine
them with fentry_test.c/fexit_test.c when arm64 is supported too.
Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
bpf_testmod_fentry_test11() to bpf_testmod.c
Meanwhile, add bpf_modify_return_test2() to test_run.c to test the
MODIFY_RETURN with 7 arguments.
Add bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7 in
bpf_testmod.c to test the struct in the arguments.
And the testcases passed on x86_64:
./test_progs -t fexit
Summary: 5/14 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t fentry
Summary: 3/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t modify_return
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t tracing_struct
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713040738.1789742-4-imagedong@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/bpf/test_run.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 63b11f7a5392..7d47f53f20c1 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -565,6 +565,13 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_modify_return_test(int a, int *b) return a + *b; } +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_modify_return_test2(int a, int *b, short c, int d, + void *e, char f, int g) +{ + *b += 1; + return a + *b + c + d + (long)e + f + g; +} + int noinline bpf_fentry_shadow_test(int a) { return a + 1; @@ -600,6 +607,7 @@ __diag_pop(); BTF_SET8_START(bpf_test_modify_return_ids) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test2) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_fentry_test1, KF_SLEEPABLE) BTF_SET8_END(bpf_test_modify_return_ids) @@ -667,7 +675,11 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog, case BPF_MODIFY_RETURN: ret = bpf_modify_return_test(1, &b); if (b != 2) - side_effect = 1; + side_effect++; + b = 2; + ret += bpf_modify_return_test2(1, &b, 3, 4, (void *)5, 6, 7); + if (b != 2) + side_effect++; break; default: goto out; |