diff options
| author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-08-15 00:05:54 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-08-17 00:45:07 +0200 |
| commit | fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded (patch) | |
| tree | 9006ce2d61e9cd8c9fa353e5cff61d5f6da09031 /net/core/filter.c | |
| parent | 1bda52f80471260bcc7391f4e6919effedfc88d8 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded.tar.gz linux-stable-fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded.tar.bz2 linux-stable-fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded.zip | |
bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN into a function
Turn BPF_PROG_RUN into a proper always inlined function. No functional and
performance changes are intended, but it makes it much easier to understand
what's going on with how BPF programs are actually get executed. It's more
obvious what types and callbacks are expected. Also extra () around input
parameters can be dropped, as well as `__` variable prefixes intended to avoid
naming collisions, which makes the code simpler to read and write.
This refactoring also highlighted one extra issue. BPF_PROG_RUN is both
a macro and an enum value (BPF_PROG_RUN == BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Turning
BPF_PROG_RUN into a function causes naming conflict compilation error. So
rename BPF_PROG_RUN into lower-case bpf_prog_run(), similar to
bpf_prog_run_xdp(), bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(), etc. All existing callers of
BPF_PROG_RUN, the macro, are switched to bpf_prog_run() explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-2-andrii@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core/filter.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/core/filter.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 3aca07c44fad..5cf38e8886f1 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_bpf_fprog_from_user); * Run the eBPF program and then cut skb->data to correct size returned by * the program. If pkt_len is 0 we toss packet. If skb->len is smaller * than pkt_len we keep whole skb->data. This is the socket level - * wrapper to BPF_PROG_RUN. It returns 0 if the packet should + * wrapper to bpf_prog_run. It returns 0 if the packet should * be accepted or -EPERM if the packet should be tossed. * */ @@ -10115,7 +10115,7 @@ struct sock *bpf_run_sk_reuseport(struct sock_reuseport *reuse, struct sock *sk, enum sk_action action; bpf_init_reuseport_kern(&reuse_kern, reuse, sk, skb, migrating_sk, hash); - action = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, &reuse_kern); + action = bpf_prog_run(prog, &reuse_kern); if (action == SK_PASS) return reuse_kern.selected_sk; |