net: Write lock dev_base_lock without disabling bottom halves.

[ Upstream commit fd888e85fe6b661e78044dddfec0be5271afa626 ]

The writer acquires dev_base_lock with disabled bottom halves.
The reader can acquire dev_base_lock without disabling bottom halves
because there is no writer in softirq context.

On PREEMPT_RT the softirqs are preemptible and local_bh_disable() acts
as a lock to ensure that resources, that are protected by disabling
bottom halves, remain protected.
This leads to a circular locking dependency if the lock acquired with
disabled bottom halves (as in write_lock_bh()) and somewhere else with
enabled bottom halves (as by read_lock() in netstat_show()) followed by
disabling bottom halves (cxgb_get_stats() -> t4_wr_mbox_meat_timeout()
-> spin_lock_bh()). This is the reverse locking order.

All read_lock() invocation are from sysfs callback which are not invoked
from softirq context. Therefore there is no need to disable bottom
halves while acquiring a write lock.

Acquire the write lock of dev_base_lock without disabling bottom halves.

Reported-by: Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
index 26c32407f029..ea7b96e296ef 100644
--- a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
+++ b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ static bool is_slave_up(struct net_device *dev)
 
 static void __hsr_set_operstate(struct net_device *dev, int transition)
 {
-	write_lock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
+	write_lock(&dev_base_lock);
 	if (dev->operstate != transition) {
 		dev->operstate = transition;
-		write_unlock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
+		write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
 		netdev_state_change(dev);
 	} else {
-		write_unlock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
+		write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
 	}
 }