diff options
author | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2020-05-29 17:43:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-05-30 21:39:13 -0700 |
commit | 10f6d46c943d1ccd1d730d2e915226cbdeaad2d5 (patch) | |
tree | 444d6c93ad26f6ed1296e125669f744b622e3bb7 /net/mptcp | |
parent | 41be81a8d3d09acb9033799938306349328861f9 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-10f6d46c943d1ccd1d730d2e915226cbdeaad2d5.tar.gz linux-stable-10f6d46c943d1ccd1d730d2e915226cbdeaad2d5.tar.bz2 linux-stable-10f6d46c943d1ccd1d730d2e915226cbdeaad2d5.zip |
mptcp: fix race between MP_JOIN and close
If a MP_JOIN subflow completes the 3whs while another
CPU is closing the master msk, we can hit the
following race:
CPU1 CPU2
close()
mptcp_close
subflow_syn_recv_sock
mptcp_token_get_sock
mptcp_finish_join
inet_sk_state_load
mptcp_token_destroy
inet_sk_state_store(TCP_CLOSE)
__mptcp_flush_join_list()
mptcp_sock_graft
list_add_tail
sk_common_release
sock_orphan()
<socket free>
The MP_JOIN socket will be leaked. Additionally we can hit
UaF for the msk 'struct socket' referenced via the 'conn'
field.
This change try to address the issue introducing some
synchronization between the MP_JOIN 3whs and mptcp_close
via the join_list spinlock. If we detect the msk is closing
the MP_JOIN socket is closed, too.
Fixes: f296234c98a8 ("mptcp: Add handling of incoming MP_JOIN requests")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/mptcp')
-rw-r--r-- | net/mptcp/protocol.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index 8959a74f707d..35bdfb4f3eae 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -1266,8 +1266,12 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout) mptcp_token_destroy(msk->token); inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); - __mptcp_flush_join_list(msk); - + /* be sure to always acquire the join list lock, to sync vs + * mptcp_finish_join(). + */ + spin_lock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock); + list_splice_tail_init(&msk->join_list, &msk->conn_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock); list_splice_init(&msk->conn_list, &conn_list); data_fin_tx_seq = msk->write_seq; @@ -1623,22 +1627,30 @@ bool mptcp_finish_join(struct sock *sk) if (!msk->pm.server_side) return true; - /* passive connection, attach to msk socket */ + if (!mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(msk)) + return false; + + /* active connections are already on conn_list, and we can't acquire + * msk lock here. + * use the join list lock as synchronization point and double-check + * msk status to avoid racing with mptcp_close() + */ + spin_lock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock); + ret = inet_sk_state_load(parent) == TCP_ESTABLISHED; + if (ret && !WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&subflow->node))) + list_add_tail(&subflow->node, &msk->join_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock); + if (!ret) + return false; + + /* attach to msk socket only after we are sure he will deal with us + * at close time + */ parent_sock = READ_ONCE(parent->sk_socket); if (parent_sock && !sk->sk_socket) mptcp_sock_graft(sk, parent_sock); - - ret = mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(msk); - if (ret) { - subflow->map_seq = msk->ack_seq; - - /* active connections are already on conn_list */ - spin_lock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock); - if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&subflow->node))) - list_add_tail(&subflow->node, &msk->join_list); - spin_unlock_bh(&msk->join_list_lock); - } - return ret; + subflow->map_seq = msk->ack_seq; + return true; } bool mptcp_sk_is_subflow(const struct sock *sk) |