Merge Linus master into drm-next

The merge is clean, but the arm build fails afterwards,
due to API changes in the regulator tree.

I've included the patch into the merge to fix the build.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
index 65f3e2b6be44..7f29cfc76349 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h>
 #include <linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h>
+#include <linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h>
 #include <net/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
 
 static int nft_compat_chain_validate_dependency(const char *tablename,
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ union nft_entry {
 	struct ipt_entry e4;
 	struct ip6t_entry e6;
 	struct ebt_entry ebt;
+	struct arpt_entry arp;
 };
 
 static inline void
@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ nft_compat_set_par(struct xt_action_param *par, void *xt, const void *xt_info)
 }
 
 static void nft_target_eval_xt(const struct nft_expr *expr,
-			       struct nft_data data[NFT_REG_MAX + 1],
+			       struct nft_regs *regs,
 			       const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
 {
 	void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
@@ -70,16 +72,16 @@ static void nft_target_eval_xt(const struct nft_expr *expr,
 
 	switch (ret) {
 	case XT_CONTINUE:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_CONTINUE;
+		regs->verdict.code = NFT_CONTINUE;
 		break;
 	default:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = ret;
+		regs->verdict.code = ret;
 		break;
 	}
 }
 
 static void nft_target_eval_bridge(const struct nft_expr *expr,
-				   struct nft_data data[NFT_REG_MAX + 1],
+				   struct nft_regs *regs,
 				   const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
 {
 	void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
@@ -96,19 +98,19 @@ static void nft_target_eval_bridge(const struct nft_expr *expr,
 
 	switch (ret) {
 	case EBT_ACCEPT:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NF_ACCEPT;
+		regs->verdict.code = NF_ACCEPT;
 		break;
 	case EBT_DROP:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NF_DROP;
+		regs->verdict.code = NF_DROP;
 		break;
 	case EBT_CONTINUE:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_CONTINUE;
+		regs->verdict.code = NFT_CONTINUE;
 		break;
 	case EBT_RETURN:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_RETURN;
+		regs->verdict.code = NFT_RETURN;
 		break;
 	default:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = ret;
+		regs->verdict.code = ret;
 		break;
 	}
 }
@@ -143,6 +145,8 @@ nft_target_set_tgchk_param(struct xt_tgchk_param *par,
 		entry->ebt.ethproto = (__force __be16)proto;
 		entry->ebt.invflags = inv ? EBT_IPROTO : 0;
 		break;
+	case NFPROTO_ARP:
+		break;
 	}
 	par->entryinfo	= entry;
 	par->target	= target;
@@ -300,7 +304,7 @@ static int nft_target_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 }
 
 static void nft_match_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
-			   struct nft_data data[NFT_REG_MAX + 1],
+			   struct nft_regs *regs,
 			   const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
 {
 	void *info = nft_expr_priv(expr);
@@ -313,16 +317,16 @@ static void nft_match_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
 	ret = match->match(skb, (struct xt_action_param *)&pkt->xt);
 
 	if (pkt->xt.hotdrop) {
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NF_DROP;
+		regs->verdict.code = NF_DROP;
 		return;
 	}
 
-	switch(ret) {
-	case true:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_CONTINUE;
+	switch (ret ? 1 : 0) {
+	case 1:
+		regs->verdict.code = NFT_CONTINUE;
 		break;
-	case false:
-		data[NFT_REG_VERDICT].verdict = NFT_BREAK;
+	case 0:
+		regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK;
 		break;
 	}
 }
@@ -357,6 +361,8 @@ nft_match_set_mtchk_param(struct xt_mtchk_param *par, const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 		entry->ebt.ethproto = (__force __be16)proto;
 		entry->ebt.invflags = inv ? EBT_IPROTO : 0;
 		break;
+	case NFPROTO_ARP:
+		break;
 	}
 	par->entryinfo	= entry;
 	par->match	= match;
@@ -543,6 +549,9 @@ nfnl_compat_get(struct sock *nfnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	case NFPROTO_BRIDGE:
 		fmt = "ebt_%s";
 		break;
+	case NFPROTO_ARP:
+		fmt = "arpt_%s";
+		break;
 	default:
 		pr_err("nft_compat: unsupported protocol %d\n",
 			nfmsg->nfgen_family);