diff options
author | John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> | 2022-10-03 01:30:38 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> | 2022-10-03 14:49:04 -0700 |
commit | 32490541682bf8ea445e9bd29c866981851e0912 (patch) | |
tree | 2c929579b8d05ec3d1c3df7740799e8e8542c8b1 /security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | |
parent | a2f31df06b7aa1769f12ec6f9ae7f18e78582cad (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-32490541682bf8ea445e9bd29c866981851e0912.tar.gz linux-stable-32490541682bf8ea445e9bd29c866981851e0912.tar.bz2 linux-stable-32490541682bf8ea445e9bd29c866981851e0912.zip |
apparmor: Fix kunit test for out of bounds array
The apparmor kunit tests are failing on the out of bounds array check
with the following failure
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:178
Expected unpack_array(puf->e, name, &array_size) == 1, but
unpack_array(puf->e, name, &array_size) == -1
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:180
Expected array_size == 0, but
array_size == 64192
not ok 5 - policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds
This is because unpack_array changed to allow distinguishing between
the array not being present and an error. In the error case the array
size is not set and should not be tested.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Fixes: 995a5b64620e ("apparmor: make unpack_array return a trianary value")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c')
-rw-r--r-- | security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c index 1a43d538c4c0..b214f6ea8a72 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c @@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ static void policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds(struct kunit *test) puf->e->end = puf->e->start + TEST_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET + sizeof(u16); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, unpack_array(puf->e, name, &array_size), - TRI_TRUE); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_size, 0); + TRI_FALSE); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, puf->e->pos, puf->e->start + TEST_NAMED_ARRAY_BUF_OFFSET); } |