summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>2020-06-22 20:22:23 -0700
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2020-06-24 00:04:36 +0200
commit2fde1747c986cac28fa66d0cffd7577db042640b (patch)
treeb63ed51d2ae66d7a8aea24308b6de2041440c8e9 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf
parent5e85c6bb8e74bd9daa4f5815da373d4ac2cb1a35 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-2fde1747c986cac28fa66d0cffd7577db042640b.tar.gz
linux-stable-2fde1747c986cac28fa66d0cffd7577db042640b.tar.bz2
linux-stable-2fde1747c986cac28fa66d0cffd7577db042640b.zip
selftests/bpf: Add variable-length data concat pattern less than test
Extend original variable-length tests with a case to catch a common existing pattern of testing for < 0 for errors. Note because verifier also tracks upper bounds and we know it can not be greater than MAX_LEN here we can skip upper bound check. In ALU64 enabled compilation converting from long->int return types in probe helpers results in extra instruction pattern, <<= 32, s >>= 32. The trade-off is the non-ALU64 case works. If you really care about every extra insn (XDP case?) then you probably should be using original int type. In addition adding a sext insn to bpf might help the verifier in the general case to avoid these types of tricks. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200623032224.4020118-3-andriin@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c12
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c70
2 files changed, 78 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c
index 7533565e096d..c75525eab02c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c
@@ -51,6 +51,18 @@ void test_varlen(void)
CHECK_VAL(data->total2, size1 + size2);
CHECK(memcmp(data->payload2, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
"doesn't match!");
+
+ CHECK_VAL(data->payload3_len1, size1);
+ CHECK_VAL(data->payload3_len2, size2);
+ CHECK_VAL(data->total3, size1 + size2);
+ CHECK(memcmp(data->payload3, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
+ "doesn't match!");
+
+ CHECK_VAL(data->payload4_len1, size1);
+ CHECK_VAL(data->payload4_len2, size2);
+ CHECK_VAL(data->total4, size1 + size2);
+ CHECK(memcmp(data->payload4, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
+ "doesn't match!");
cleanup:
test_varlen__destroy(skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c
index 09691852debf..cd4b72c55dfe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c
@@ -26,8 +26,18 @@ int payload2_len2 = -1;
int total2 = -1;
char payload2[MAX_LEN + MAX_LEN] = { 1 };
+int payload3_len1 = -1;
+int payload3_len2 = -1;
+int total3= -1;
+char payload3[MAX_LEN + MAX_LEN] = { 1 };
+
+int payload4_len1 = -1;
+int payload4_len2 = -1;
+int total4= -1;
+char payload4[MAX_LEN + MAX_LEN] = { 1 };
+
SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
-int handler64(void *regs)
+int handler64_unsigned(void *regs)
{
int pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
void *payload = payload1;
@@ -54,8 +64,34 @@ int handler64(void *regs)
return 0;
}
-SEC("tp_btf/sys_enter")
-int handler32(void *regs)
+SEC("raw_tp/sys_exit")
+int handler64_signed(void *regs)
+{
+ int pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+ void *payload = payload3;
+ long len;
+
+ /* ignore irrelevant invocations */
+ if (test_pid != pid || !capture)
+ return 0;
+
+ len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(payload, MAX_LEN, &buf_in1[0]);
+ if (len >= 0) {
+ payload += len;
+ payload3_len1 = len;
+ }
+ len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(payload, MAX_LEN, &buf_in2[0]);
+ if (len >= 0) {
+ payload += len;
+ payload3_len2 = len;
+ }
+ total3 = payload - (void *)payload3;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp/raw_syscalls/sys_enter")
+int handler32_unsigned(void *regs)
{
int pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
void *payload = payload2;
@@ -82,7 +118,33 @@ int handler32(void *regs)
return 0;
}
-SEC("tp_btf/sys_exit")
+SEC("tp/raw_syscalls/sys_exit")
+int handler32_signed(void *regs)
+{
+ int pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+ void *payload = payload4;
+ int len;
+
+ /* ignore irrelevant invocations */
+ if (test_pid != pid || !capture)
+ return 0;
+
+ len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(payload, MAX_LEN, &buf_in1[0]);
+ if (len >= 0) {
+ payload += len;
+ payload4_len1 = len;
+ }
+ len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(payload, MAX_LEN, &buf_in2[0]);
+ if (len >= 0) {
+ payload += len;
+ payload4_len2 = len;
+ }
+ total4 = payload - (void *)payload4;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_exit_getpid")
int handler_exit(void *regs)
{
long bla;