| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The __phys_to_dma vs phys_to_dma distinction isn't exactly obvious. Try
to improve the situation by renaming __phys_to_dma to
phys_to_dma_unencryped, and not forcing architectures that want to
override phys_to_dma to actually provide __phys_to_dma.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no harm in just always clearing the SME encryption bit, while
significantly simplifying the interface.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
|
|
|
Provide phys_to_dma/dma_to_phys helpers, everything else is generic.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/19546/
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Cc: Tom Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
|
