| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On RISC-V, the return address is before the current frame pointer,
unlike on most other architectures. Use the correct offset on RISC-V
to fix the CFI_BACKWARD test.
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230927224757.1154247-14-samitolvanen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The CFI test uses the branch-protection=none compiler attribute to
disable PAC return address protection on a function. While newer GCC
versions support this attribute, older versions (GCC 7 and 8) instead
supported the sign-return-address=none attribute, leading to a build
failure when the test is built with older compilers. Fix it by checking
which attribute is supported and using the correct one.
Fixes: 2e53b877dc12 ("lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations")
Reported-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEUSe78kDPxQmQqCWW-_9LCgJDFhAeMoVBFnX9QLx18Z4uT4VQ@mail.gmail.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang can convert the indirect calls in lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO into
direct calls. Move the call into a noinline function that accepts the
target address as an argument to ensure the compiler actually emits an
indirect call instead.
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220908215504.3686827-8-samitolvanen@google.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is a pointer being initialized with a zero, use NULL instead.
Cleans up sparse warning:
drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c:100:27: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612202708.2754270-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The masking for PAC bits wasn't handling 32-bit architectures correctly.
Replace the u64 cast with uintptr_t.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdVz-J-1ZQ08u0bsQihDkcRmEPrtX5B_oRJ+Ns5jrasnUw@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 2e53b877dc12 ("lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations")
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427001226.1224704-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to test various backward-edge control flow integrity methods,
add a test that manipulates the return address on the stack. Currently
only arm64 Pointer Authentication and Shadow Call Stack is supported.
$ echo CFI_BACKWARD | cat >/sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
Under SCS, successful test of the mitigation is reported as:
lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD
lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address.
lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: control flow unchanged.
Under PAC, successful test of the mitigation is reported by the PAC
exception handler:
lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD
lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address.
lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bfffffc0088d0514
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x86000004
EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[bfffffc0088d0514] address between user and kernel address ranges
...
If the CONFIGs are missing (or the mitigation isn't working), failure
is reported as:
lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD
lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address.
lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: FAIL: stack return address was redirected!
lkdtm: This is probably expected, since this kernel was built *without* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL=y nor CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK=y
Co-developed-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220416001103.1524653-1-keescook@chromium.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's long been annoying that to add a new LKDTM test one had to update
lkdtm.h and core.c to get it "registered". Switch to a per-category
list and update the crashtype walking code in core.c to handle it.
This also means that all the lkdtm_* tests themselves can be static now.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For various failure conditions, try to include some details about where
to look for reasons about the failure.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210623203936.3151093-8-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This adds a simple test for forward CFI (indirect function calls) with
function prototype granularity (as implemented by Clang's CFI).
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
|