summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/asm-arm/unistd.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [ARM] move include/asm-arm to arch/arm/include/asmRussell King2008-08-021-450/+0
| | | | | | | Move platform independent header files to arch/arm/include/asm, leaving those in asm/arch* and asm/plat* alone. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 4852/1: Add timerfd_create, timerfd_settime and timerfd_gettime ↵Uwe Kleine-König2008-04-191-1/+3
| | | | | | | syscall entries Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Add fallocate syscall entryRussell King2007-10-121-0/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] shut up "warning: "__IGNORE_sync_file_range" redefined"Russell King2007-07-201-1/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARMDavid Woodhouse2007-06-281-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Not all the world is an i386. Many architectures need 64-bit arguments to be aligned in suitable pairs of registers, and the original sys_sync_file_range(int, loff_t, loff_t, int) was therefore wasting an argument register for padding after the first integer. Since we don't normally have more than 6 arguments for system calls, that left no room for the final argument on some architectures. Fix this by introducing sys_sync_file_range2(int, int, loff_t, loff_t) which all fits nicely. In fact, ARM already had that, but called it sys_arm_sync_file_range. Move it to fs/sync.c and rename it, then implement the needed compatibility routine. And stop the missing syscall check from bitching about the absence of sys_sync_file_range() if we've implemented sys_sync_file_range2() instead. Tested on PPC32 and with 32-bit and 64-bit userspace on PPC64. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* [ARM] Update ARM syscallsRussell King2007-05-161-0/+10
| | | | | | | | Add utimensat, signalfd, timerfd, eventfd syscalls. Add ignore defines for sync_file_range and fadvise64_64 which we implement differently. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Fix __NR_kexec_loadRussell King2007-04-011-1/+1
| | | | | | It's __NR_kexec_load, not __NR_sys_kexec_load Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 4137/1: Add kexec supportRichard Purdie2007-02-161-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add kexec support to ARM. Improvements like commandline handling could be made but this patch gives basic functional support. It uses the next available syscall number, 347. Once the syscall number is known, userspace support will be finalised/submitted to kexec-tools, various patches already exist. Originally based on a patch by Maxim Syrchin but updated and forward ported by various people. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Add more syscallsRussell King2006-12-171-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add: sys_unshare sys_set_robust_list sys_get_robust_list sys_splice sys_arm_sync_file_range sys_tee sys_vmsplice sys_move_pages sys_getcpu Special note about sys_arm_sync_file_range(), which is implemented as: asmlinkage long sys_arm_sync_file_range(int fd, unsigned int flags, loff_t offset, loff_t nbytes) { return sys_sync_file_range(fd, offset, nbytes, flags); } We can't export sys_sync_file_range() directly on ARM because the argument list someone picked does not fit in the available registers. Would be nice if... there was an arch maintainer review mechanism for new syscalls before they hit the kernel. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Add sys_*at syscallsRussell King2006-12-091-0/+13
| | | | | | Later glibc requires the *at syscalls. Add them. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [PATCH] remove kernel syscallsArnd Bergmann2006-12-071-150/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | The last thing we agreed on was to remove the macros entirely for 2.6.19, on all architectures. Unfortunately, I think nobody actually _did_ that, so they are still there. [akpm@osdl.org: x86_64 fix] Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Greg Schafer <gschafer@zip.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] rename the provided execve functions to kernel_execveArnd Bergmann2006-10-021-24/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some architectures provide an execve function that does not set errno, but instead returns the result code directly. Rename these to kernel_execve to get the right semantics there. Moreover, there is no reasone for any of these architectures to still provide __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ or _syscallN macros, so remove these right away. [akpm@osdl.org: build fix] [bunk@stusta.de: build fix] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata.hirokazu@renesas.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> Cc: Richard Curnow <rc@rc0.org.uk> Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Cc: Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] consistently use MAX_ERRNO in __syscall_returnRandy Dunlap2006-09-271-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | Consistently use MAX_ERRNO when checking for errors in __syscall_return(). [ralf@linux-mips.org: build fix] Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6David Woodhouse2006-05-061-8/+15
|\ | | | | | | Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
| * [ARM] 3495/1: EABI: undefine removed syscalls, but...Nicolas Pitre2006-05-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre ... but only for user space. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
| * [ARM] 3486/1: Mark memory as clobbered by the ARM _syscallX() macrosMarkus Gutschke2006-04-301-7/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Markus Gutschke In order to prevent gcc from making incorrect optimizations, all asm() statements that define system calls should report memory as clobbered. Recent versions of the headers for i386 have been changed accordingly, but the ARM headers are still defective. This patch fixes the bug tracked at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6205 Signed-off-by: Markus Gutschke <markus@google.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* | Remove unneeded _syscallX macros from user view in asm-*/unistd.hDavid Woodhouse2006-04-291-5/+5
|/ | | | | | | | These aren't needed by glibc or klibc, and they're broken in some cases anyway. The uClibc folks are apparently switching over to stop using them too (now that we agreed that they should be dropped, at least). Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
* [ARM] 3477/1: ARM EABI: undefine removed syscallsNicolas Pitre2006-04-151-0/+18
| | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre Avoid confusion for libraries assuming that a given syscall is available when corresponding symbol is defined. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Allow un-muxed syscalls to be available for everyoneRussell King2006-03-301-11/+0
| | | | | | | | It's been a while since the un-muxed socket and ipc syscalls were introduced, so make the unistd.h number definitions visible for non-EABI as well as EABI. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 3339/1: ARM EABI: make unmuxed syscalls visibleNicolas Pitre2006-02-161-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre With EABI the multiplex sys_ipc and sys_socketcall syscalls are unavailable and their support code even removed from the compiled kernel, and the new unmuxed syscalls must be used instead. Make those syscall numbers visible. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 3110/5: old ABI compat: multi-ABI syscall entry supportNicolas Pitre2006-01-141-7/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre This patch adds the required code to support both user space ABIs at the same time. A second syscall table is created to include legacy ABI syscalls that need an ABI compat wrapper. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 3105/4: ARM EABI: new syscall entry conventionNicolas Pitre2006-01-141-22/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre For a while we wanted to change the way syscalls were called on ARM. Instead of encoding the syscall number in the swi instruction which requires reading back the instruction from memory to extract that number and polluting the data cache, it was decided that simply storing the syscall number into r7 would be more efficient. Since this represents an ABI change then making that change at the same time as EABI support is the right thing to do. It is now expected that EABI user space binaries put the syscall number into r7 and use "swi 0" to call the kernel. Syscall register argument are also expected to have "EABI arrangement" i.e. 64-bit arguments should be put in a pair of registers from an even register number. Example with long ftruncate64(unsigned int fd, loff_t length): legacy ABI: - put fd into r0 - put length into r1-r2 - use "swi #(0x900000 + 194)" to call the kernel new ARM EABI: - put fd into r0 - put length into r2-r3 (skipping over r1) - put 194 into r7 - use "swi 0" to call the kernel Note that it is important to use 0 for the swi argument as backward compatibility with legacy ABI user space relies on this. The syscall macros in asm-arm/unistd.h were also updated to support both ABIs and implement the right call method automatically. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [PATCH] unify sys_ptrace prototypeChristoph Hellwig2005-10-301-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | Make sure we always return, as all syscalls should. Also move the common prototype to <linux/syscalls.h> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [ARM] Add memory type based allocation syscallsRussell King2005-09-091-0/+3
| | | | | | | Add syscall numbers and syscall table entries for mbind, set_mempolicy and get_mempolicy. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 2865/2: fix fadvise64_64 syscall argument passingNicolas Pitre2005-09-011-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre The prototype for sys_fadvise64_64() is: long sys_fadvise64_64(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice) The argument list is therefore as follows on legacy ABI: fd: type int (r0) offset: type long long (r1-r2) len: type long long (r3-sp[0]) advice: type int (sp[4]) With EABI this becomes: fd: type int (r0) offset: type long long (r2-r3) len: type long long (sp[0]-sp[4]) advice: type int (sp[8]) Not only do we have ABI differences here, but the EABI version requires one additional word on the syscall stack. To avoid the ABI mismatch and the extra stack space required with EABI this syscall is now defined with a different argument ordering on ARM as follows: long sys_arm_fadvise64_64(int fd, int advice, loff_t offset, loff_t len) This gives us the following ABI independent argument distribution: fd: type int (r0) advice: type int (r1) offset: type long long (r2-r3) len: type long long (sp[0]-sp[4]) Now, since the syscall entry code takes care of 5 registers only by default including the store of r4 to the stack, we need a wrapper to store r5 to the stack as well. Because that wrapper was missing and was always required this means that sys_fadvise64_64 never worked on ARM and therefore we can safely reuse its syscall number for our new sys_arm_fadvise64_64 interface. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] 2858/1: ARM has sys_fadvise64_64 onlyNicolas Pitre2005-08-291-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre There is no need to define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_FADVISE64 on ARM since it only serves to compile in a compatibility wrapper for sys_fadvise64 which never was tied to any syscall number. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [ARM] Add syscall stubs for inotify and ioprio system callsRobert Love2005-08-151-0/+5
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Robert Love <rml@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* [PATCH] ARM: 2651/3: kernel helpers for NPTL supportNicolas Pitre2005-04-291-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch from Nicolas Pitre This patch entirely reworks the kernel assistance for NPTL on ARM. In particular this provides an efficient way to retrieve the TLS value and perform atomic operations without any instruction emulation nor special system call. This even allows for pre ARMv6 binaries to be forward compatible with SMP systems without any penalty. The problematic and performance critical operations are performed through segment of kernel provided user code reachable from user space at a fixed address in kernel memory. Those fixed entry points are within the vector page so we basically get it for free as no extra memory page is required and nothing else may be mapped at that location anyway. This is different from (but doesn't preclude) a full blown VDSO implementation, however a VDSO would prevent some assembly tricks with constants that allows for efficient branching to those code segments. And since those code segments only use a few cycles before returning to user code, the overhead of a VDSO far call would add a significant overhead to such minimalistic operations. The ARM_NR_set_tls syscall also changed number. This is done for two reasons: 1) this patch changes the way the TLS value was previously meant to be retrieved, therefore we ensure whatever library using the old way gets fixed (they only exist in private tree at the moment since the NPTL work is still progressing). 2) the previous number was allocated in a range causing an undefined instruction trap on kernels not supporting that syscall and it was determined that allocating it in a range returning -ENOSYS would be much nicer for libraries trying to determine if the feature is present or not. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-161-0/+558
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-05 17:00:05 +0000