summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/fortify_kunit.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* fortify: Improve buffer overflow reportingKees Cook2024-02-291-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve the reporting of buffer overflows under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE to help accelerate debugging efforts. The calculations are all just sitting in registers anyway, so pass them along to the function to be reported. For example, before: detected buffer overflow in memcpy and after: memcpy: detected buffer overflow: 4096 byte read of buffer size 1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407192717.636137-10-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: Add KUnit tests for runtime overflowsKees Cook2024-02-291-2/+605
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With fortify overflows able to be redirected, we can use KUnit to exercise the overflow conditions. Add tests for every API covered by CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, except for memset() and memcpy(), which are special-cased for now. Disable warnings in the Makefile since we're explicitly testing known-bad string handling code patterns. Note that this makes the LKDTM FORTIFY_STR* tests obsolete, but those can be removed separately. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: Provide KUnit counters for failure testingKees Cook2024-02-291-0/+41
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The standard C string APIs were not designed to have a failure mode; they were expected to always succeed without memory safety issues. Normally, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE will use fortify_panic() to stop processing, as truncating a read or write may provide an even worse system state. However, this creates a problem for testing under things like KUnit, which needs a way to survive failures. When building with CONFIG_KUNIT, provide a failure path for all users of fortify_panic, and track whether the failure was a read overflow or a write overflow, for KUnit tests to examine. Inspired by similar logic in the slab tests. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: Allow KUnit test to build without FORTIFYKees Cook2024-02-291-0/+14
| | | | | | | | In order for CI systems to notice all the skipped tests related to CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, allow the FORTIFY_SOURCE KUnit tests to build with or without CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: test: Use kunit_devicedavidgow@google.com2023-12-181-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | Using struct root_device to create fake devices for tests is something of a hack. The new struct kunit_device is meant for this purpose, so use it instead. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* Revert "fortify: Allow KUnit test to build without FORTIFY"Kees Cook2023-07-031-14/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit a9dc8d0442294b426b1ebd4ec6097c82ebe282e0. The standard for KUnit is to not build tests at all when required functionality is missing, rather than doing test "skip". Restore this for the fortify tests, so that architectures without CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE do not emit unsolvable warnings. Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdUrxOEroHVUt7-mAnKSBjY=a-D3jr+XiAifuwv06Ob9Pw@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: Allow KUnit test to build without FORTIFYKees Cook2023-05-161-0/+14
| | | | | | | | In order for CI systems to notice all the skipped tests related to CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, allow the FORTIFY_SOURCE KUnit tests to build with or without CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* kunit/fortify: Validate __alloc_size attribute resultsKees Cook2022-11-221-0/+255
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Validate the effect of the __alloc_size attribute on allocators. If the compiler doesn't support __builtin_dynamic_object_size(), skip the associated tests. (For GCC, just remove the "--make_options" line below...) $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y \ --make_options LLVM=1 fortify ... [15:16:30] ================== fortify (10 subtests) =================== [15:16:30] [PASSED] known_sizes_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] control_flow_split_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kmalloc_const_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kmalloc_dynamic_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_vmalloc_const_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_vmalloc_dynamic_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_const_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_dynamic_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_const_test [15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_dynamic_test [15:16:30] ===================== [PASSED] fortify ===================== [15:16:30] ============================================================ [15:16:30] Testing complete. Ran 10 tests: passed: 10 [15:16:31] Elapsed time: 8.348s total, 0.002s configuring, 6.923s building, 1.075s running For earlier GCC prior to version 12, the dynamic tests will be skipped: [15:18:59] ================== fortify (10 subtests) =================== [15:18:59] [PASSED] known_sizes_test [15:18:59] [PASSED] control_flow_split_test [15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_kmalloc_const_test [15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_kmalloc_dynamic_test [15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_vmalloc_const_test [15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_vmalloc_dynamic_test [15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_const_test [15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_dynamic_test [15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_const_test [15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_dynamic_test [15:18:59] ===================== [PASSED] fortify ===================== [15:18:59] ============================================================ [15:18:59] Testing complete. Ran 10 tests: passed: 6, skipped: 4 [15:18:59] Elapsed time: 11.965s total, 0.002s configuring, 10.540s building, 1.068s running Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: Adjust KUnit test for modular buildKees Cook2022-09-141-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | A much better "unknown size" string pointer is available directly from struct test, so use that instead of a global that isn't shared with modules. Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YyCOHOchVuE/E7vS@dev-arch.thelio-3990X Fixes: 875bfd5276f3 ("fortify: Add KUnit test for FORTIFY_SOURCE internals") Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Build-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* fortify: Add KUnit test for FORTIFY_SOURCE internalsKees Cook2022-09-071-0/+77
Add lib/fortify_kunit.c KUnit test for checking the expected behavioral characteristics of FORTIFY_SOURCE internals. Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>