summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2021-11-05 14:33:42 -0400
committerLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2021-11-17 17:36:49 -0500
commit37fe0cf5fb803d98efd7feb64b408c9b029c1085 (patch)
tree6d1479f594134b3200c10d16db9ce7cdfd94d195 /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml
parentf58a435311672305d8747f40e35235f7ed64ae69 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-37fe0cf5fb803d98efd7feb64b408c9b029c1085.tar.gz
linux-stable-37fe0cf5fb803d98efd7feb64b408c9b029c1085.tar.bz2
linux-stable-37fe0cf5fb803d98efd7feb64b408c9b029c1085.zip
drm/i915: Clarify probing order in intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs()
Hooray! We've managed to hit enough bugs upstream that I've been able to come up with a pretty solid explanation for how backlight controls are actually supposed to be detected and used these days. As well, having the rest of the PWM bits in VESA's backlight interface implemented seems to have fixed all of the problematic brightness controls laptop panels that we've hit so far. So, let's actually document this instead of just calling the laptop panels liars. As well, I would like to formally apologize to all of the laptop panels I called liars. I'm sorry laptop panels, hopefully you can all forgive me and we can move past this~ Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105183342.130810-6-lyude@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/st,stm32-rng.yaml')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions