summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* drm/i915: rename intel_sideband.[ch] to intel_sbi.[ch]Jani Nikula2021-10-141-20/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | Now that intel_sideband.[ch] has been decluttered, it's pure lpt/wpt iosf sideband. Let's call it intel_sbi, following the function naming. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/183423ff23b2d259e4a197e74daf6bcd750bfe14.1634207064.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
* drm/i915: split out intel_pcode.[ch] to separate fileJani Nikula2021-10-141-13/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The snb+ pcode mailbox code is not sideband, so split it out to a separate file. As can be seen from the #include changes, very few places use both sideband and pcode. Code movement only. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/185deb18eb739e5ae019e27834b9997dcc1347bc.1634207064.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
* drm/i915: split out vlv sideband to a separate fileJani Nikula2021-10-141-110/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The VLV/CHV sideband code is pretty distinct from the rest of the sideband code. Split it out to new vlv_sideband.[ch]. Pure code movement with relevant #include changes, and a tiny checkpatch fix on top. Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/755ebbbaf01fc6d306b763b6ef60f45e671ba290.1634119597.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
* drm/i915: dgfx cards need to wait on pcode's uncore init doneBadal Nilawar2021-07-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In discrete cards, the graphics driver shouldn't proceed with the probe or resume unless PCODE indicated everything is done, including memory training and gt bring up. For this reason, the driver probe and resume paths needs to be blocked until PCODE indicates it is done. Also, it needs to aborted if the notification never arrives. In general, the few miliseconds would be enough and the regular PCODE recommendation for the timeout was 10 seconds. However there are some rare cases where this initialization can take up to 1 minute. So, PCODE has increased the recommendation to 3 minutes so we don't fully block the device utilization when something just got delayed for whatever reason. To be on the safest side, let's accept this recommendation, since on the regular case it won't delay or block the driver initialization and resume flows Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210727173338.901264-1-badal.nilawar@intel.com
* drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startupMatt Roper2020-10-051-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DG1 does some additional pcode/uncore handshaking at boot time; this handshaking must complete before various other pcode commands are effective and before general work is submitted to the GPU. We need to poll a new pcode mailbox during startup until it reports that this handshaking is complete. The bspec doesn't give guidance on how long we may need to wait for this handshaking to complete. For now, let's just set a really long timeout; if we still don't get a completion status by the end of that timeout, we'll just continue on and hope for the best. v2 (Lucas): Rename macros to make clear the relation between command and result (requested by José) Bspec: 52065 Cc: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001063917.3133475-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
* drm/i915: Make sandybridge_pcode_read() deal with the second data registerVille Syrjälä2019-05-271-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | The pcode mailbox has two data registers. So far we've only ever used the one, but that's about to change. Expose the second data register to the callers of sandybridge_pcode_read(). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521164025.30225-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
* drm/i915: Move sandybride pcode access to intel_sideband.cChris Wilson2019-04-261-0/+10
| | | | | | | | sandybride_pcode is another sideband, so move it to their new home. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
* drm/i915: Separate sideband declarations to intel_sideband.hChris Wilson2019-04-261-0/+130
Split the sideback declarations out of the ginormous i915_drv.h Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426081725.31217-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk